BREAKING NEWS
 

Appeal over murder plot conviction is rejected

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Profile image for Western Morning News

Western Morning News

A Cornish grandmother serving a 20-year stretch for plotting to murder her pagan lover has failed in a Court of Appeal bid to clear her name.

Margaret Anne James, 64, of Porthoustock, has always denied conspiring to kill 56-year-old parish councillor and Druid community member Peter Solheim.

The father-of-two disappeared in the middle of June 2004 and his body was later found floating five miles off the Lizard Peninsula.

In July 2006, James was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to murder her lover at Truro Crown Court and sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment.

Public Speaking / Presentation Coaching

Trevor Lee Media

View details

Print voucher

Are you nervous about public speaking or presenting ? I can help you become both confident and competent. For June I'm offering 60 minute coaching sessions for just £45 - Trevor Lee 07785 390717

Terms: Offer available to private individuals and businesses throughout June 2013.

Contact: 01326 330668

Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013

Six years on, she took her case to the Court of Appeal yesterday, claiming she had been wrongly convicted, but had her "unarguable" case rejected by three judges.

Giving judgment, Judge Melbourne Inman QC, Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Cranston said there was nothing to suggest James's conviction was unsafe. The court heard James and Mr Solheim had been in a relationship for about nine years, but he had been having a simultaneous relationship with another woman.

Prosecutors alleged the other relationship and the fact he had been in the process of buying a ring for the woman were part of the reason for James wanting him dead.

Evidence was put forward by a witness at the trial of her having spoken about finding a tasteless poison with which to lace his food and kill him.

In the appeal hearing in London yesterday, her legal team argued that the evidence was "hearsay" and should never have gone before the jury.

It was also argued that further information, not seen by James's lawyers, might now be available which could help her in an appeal against the conviction.

However, the appeal was rejected by the judges.

Tweet this article
Report
 
 
 
 
 
 

Tell us about your area

Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

  Write an article