Battle of the beaver erupts
CRACKS of "real division" are emerging in a quiet Westcountry farming community where a proposed trial to reintroduce beavers has prompted deep unease.
The Western Morning News has heard from frustrated landowners neighbouring the 730-acre Roadford Lake reservoir in West Devon, where England's most advanced beaver reintroduction programme could take place.
-

Beavers may be introduced to help purify our drinking water
South West Water (SWW) is interested in shipping in the creatures – which are native to this country but were hunted to extinction in England in the 13th Century – to help purify drinking water taken from the reservoir, which supplies 600,000 homes in Devon and Cornwall.
The WMN can reveal countryside agency Natural England will publish on Wednesday its much-anticipated feasibility study stating clear support for the wider reintroduction of beavers in the countryside.
At a village hall meeting organised by landowning engineer-turned-builder Chris Durston, waterside landowners expressed fears over destruction of trees, tourists trampling over their land, and disease.
"We are beaver-free at the moment," said one riparian landowner. "That's the way we like it."
Critics are convinced the plan is "folly" and, with echoes of the hunting ban, is being foisted upon the rural community by urban "bunny-huggers".
Mr Durston, who is backed by the chairman of the local parish council, said: "This whole thing is really getting messy. One of my wishes is that this uninvited intrusion does not cause division in the local community. Unfortunately, this has now begun."
But while opposition is vociferous, there remains a complicated jigsaw of views among others in the community, including fellow landowners who have witnessed beavers roaming wild in Bavaria.
They are philosophical about the wider ecological benefits that beavers would bring and the area becoming a popular spot for money-spinning eco-tourism.
Businessman and landowner Simon Kerslake, who has 100 acres of land bordering Roadford, believes that the argument has become too "one-sided". After the meeting, he said: "I'd like the opportunity to ask questions of SWW, and I'd like to speak to Derek Gow [the beaver specialist advising SWW], before I make a decision. Other people think the same thing."
One of the UK's leading beaver experts, Mr Gow hit back at critics of the plan by describing the "myths" being peddled, such as beavers chopping down 300 big trees each season, as "disingenuous, if not downright misleading".
SWW said that if the "leap of faith" worked, water bills would come down for households across the region, as beaver dams would be among a parcel of "natural" alternatives to investing tens of millions of pounds in upgrading water treatment facilities.
The increasingly acrimonious arguments within a basket of Devon-Cornwall border villages, which the WMN understands has led to "bitter" and "nasty" confrontations after public meetings, could potentially be played out in the wider Westcountry.
Natural England's research is to be presented to the Government to inform future policy decisions. A similar process that was carried out north of the border has led to the UK's first beaver reintroduction trial – sanctioned by the Scottish Executive – at a wildlife reserve in western Scotland later this year. Natural England's report is significant for the region because Devon and Cornwall are seen as being good habitats for beavers thanks to the easily containable river network, few game fish issues and abundance of willow, a main food tree for beaver.
A spokesman for Natural England, which has responsibility for licensing, stressed that with an application for a beaver permit, as with any other species, the ecological, economic and social effects were given deep consideration.
He added: "Without wishing to come down on one side or another, any licence application would be subject to the most rigorous process.
"That includes the welfare of the beavers and the right of landowners – if that has not been satisfied, the licence will not be granted."












14 Comments
View all
by mike garcia, Beaminster
Tuesday, March 17 2009, 4:10PM
“I¿m not aware of any scientific literature worldwide that relates to Beavers cleaning up Blue Green Algae.
The kind of algae that makes your tap water taste and smell foul is almost certainly bound to be also toxic ¿ not only to humans, but all animals ¿ farm stock, fish, birds and that includes beavers!
If the water source has ever been contaminated in the past by algae blooms then no amount of beaver can help ¿ the algae (bacteria 0.002mm dia) are already there at the bottom of the lake just waiting for the right conditions of sun, wind and water temperature before they surface and form the well known bluegreen algae blooms that really cause the most trouble.
The environment agency are no help ¿ they only act reactively - after the blooms have formed ¿ and only to confirm species and toxicity, if any! But check out their website anyway.
From the combination of past recent weather and the present warm spell I would opine that if you¿re going to get blue-green algae in your ponds, lakes or rivers then now is the time to start because whatever treatment (e.g.. barley straw) you choose to make, it¿s already almost too late for this year.
Mike Garcia
01308 861024
07875661939”
by Clare, Ontario, Canada
Tuesday, March 17 2009, 1:00AM
“Be careful, we have beavers in our backyard who have built two huge lodges & are forever refining their dams that cause flooding which does a lot of damage by killing trees & generally altering the terrain. They are pretty nifty at felling trees too & have chewed their way through many in our woodlot. Our farm borders an acreage of crown land where their activities are unmonitored”
by alan, p
Monday, March 16 2009, 11:54PM
“The idiots who think they can walk down to a riverside to watch beavers, live in a fantasy world.”
by Daisy, Devon
Monday, March 16 2009, 10:55PM
“Andrew from Dorset, I have to disagree with your immature and short-sighted comments. Sad people? I don't think so. Quite the opposite. I am all for the landowners who are fighting to try and retain their sense of personal freedom and space. After all, Devon is a special, largely unspoilt natural part of our world, and that is why many people, myself included, choose to remain in the area - an area where they have known and loved for the greatest part of their lives. Think again when you call us 'sad' - because I would like to suggest that we are quite the opposite - strong, determined and proud of our Devon.
Anna, how many times have you drank water from a tap and felt sick from the after-effects?? It seems to be just an excuse or a poorly backed-up reason for SWW to ride on the back of. How much algae is in our water? Is it enough to cause a problem? And if it was such a problem, why wasn't something done about it before now?? Yes I agree, a natural 'cure' is better - but how can beavers possibly be purely beneficial?? They will wreak havoc to our natural Devon habitat and leave a lot of unhappy landowners in their wake. Surely we should be allowed to stand up for something that might affect our futures? How can you put a beaver's worth higher than that of a person? A person who has soul and a home in Devon, in fact - people, people that have put blood, sweat and tears into the land - only for it to be teared down by intruders (because that is what they are).
In my (humble) opinion, SWW might say that the reintroduction of beavers will eventually lead to lower water bills for customers - but what is the time-scale of this? When will we see these financial benefits?? If at all? And have you thought about where the huge sums of money are going to come from, to fund this whole project? Oh look! There goes another flying beaver...oh sorry, I meant...pigs.”
by Charles Henry 1945-(diuturnity), Somersetshire
Monday, March 16 2009, 8:36PM
“:D :D :D
Why don't you become a Farmer Anna? . . I DID!!!
Amongst other things.
But it was damned hard WORK!!
Best Charles.”