Badger cull trial gets the go-ahead

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Profile image for Western Morning News

Western Morning News

The Government has sanctioned a cull of badgers in a bid to finally end the misery of tuberculosis in cattle blighting the Westcountry.

Environment Secretary Caroline Spelman announced in the Commons yesterday six-week "pilot" culls will take place in two areas in autumn next year.

Ministers will choose from a shortlist of potential cull areas to be drawn up next month. Mrs Spelman said they would take place in areas devastated by the disease, namely the South West.

Devon or Cornwall and Gloucestershire are thought to be the front-runners.

If the pilots are effective, they would clear the path for up to 40 culls in "hotspots" as part of a package of measures to eradicate the disease.

After 15 years of fierce debate, farming leaders hailed the decision to tackle bovine tuberculosis (TB), which led to nearly 25,000 cattle being slaughtered in England last year.

But animal welfare groups are horrified, and police forces could be saddled with a £500,000 a year bill to keep the peace in each cull area.

Mrs Spelman told MPs: "I am acutely aware that many people are opposed to the culling of badgers and I wish that there was a current satisfactory alternative.

"But we can't escape the fact that the evidence supports the case for the controlled reduction of the badger population in the areas affected by bovine TB."

Mrs Spelman insisted the decision to pilot culls, set against the disease potentially costing taxpayers £1 billion over 10 years, is based on science.

The pilots next year will determine whether "controlled shooting" – licensed deer-stalkers shooting free-running badgers – is safe, effective and humane.

While far less controversial, vaccines for badgers and cattle are fraught with difficulties, ranging from high costs to being years away from approval.

On Monday, the Western Morning News reported the minister would give the pilots the go-ahead, but that they would have to wait until after the Olympics against fears police forces would be over-stretched. The autumn start also gives ministers chance to ward off an "inevitable" legal challenge. The Badger Trust said it was "clearly very disappointed" and would consult lawyers to decide what action could be taken.

For the pilots to be successful, the badger population will have to be reduced by 70 per cent in each area, leading to a possible reduction of bovine TB by 16 per cent.

Yesterday's announcement was "another massive step forward", said the National Farmers' Union. In July, Mrs Spelman said she was only "strongly minded" to authorise culling.

In the Commons, Neil Parish, Conservative MP for Tiverton and Honiton, who sits on the environment select committee, said the decision was "absolutely right".

He said: "If you tackle the disease in the wildlife, you stop it reinfecting the cattle every year, which is what has been happening for years. The only way they tackled the disease in New Zealand and Australia was by tackling it in wildlife."

But Andrew George, MP for St Ives and Lib Dem agricultural spokesman, said: "We must all hope that this policy will help and not make the matter worse. In particular the Government will have to strengthen its plans to undertake a proper and rigorous assessment of the badger population in each of the pilot areas."

Mary Creagh, Labour's Shadow Environment Secretary, said: "The cull will cost farmers more than it saves them and will spread bovine TB in the short term as badgers move out of cull areas. This is bad news for wildlife, farmers and the taxpayer."

54
Tweet this article
Report

54 Comments

  • Profile image for 2ladybugs

    by 2ladybugs

    Friday, December 16 2011, 3:56PM

    “@whothefizit

    I give up with you.


    Happy christmas”

  • Profile image for GRIBBLE666

    by GRIBBLE666

    Friday, December 16 2011, 3:44PM

    “@2ladybugs
    Do you really think this government all the last one for that matter give a flying picket about how many badgers are killed and if they are infected or not.
    lets be honest they really didnt give a **** if Iraq had any weapons of mass destruction
    or about the innocent Iraqi children killed.

    Oh and please dont try and bully me (i am not one of your ex-husbands)
    as Anna says it affects my confidence in the bedroom.”

  • Profile image for whothefizit

    by whothefizit

    Friday, December 16 2011, 3:40PM

    “Yes a TINY part of our economy.”

  • Profile image for whothefizit

    by whothefizit

    Friday, December 16 2011, 3:38PM

    “@2ladybugs, you agree that culling may be pointless and expensive, and then throw in an irrelevant comment about complaining not achieving anything. Who is complaining.? Just voicing an opinion as you do. Frequently.”

  • Profile image for 2ladybugs

    by 2ladybugs

    Friday, December 16 2011, 3:33PM

    “@GRIBBLE666

    Naive.... me. Do give it up otherwise I shall have to say things to you which almost certainly will be immediately removed by the adjudicators.

    You have no idea who is doing the killing - unless of course you have insider knowledge, which I know for sure you don't have.

    They are NOT wiping the whole species out that would be nigh on impossible. If you believe that...well...there is no hope for you. Do you think that if you started killing all the seagulls in your immediate area that some more wouldn't come in to replace them?

    I don't want to fall out with you over this but pleeeeeease!”

  • Profile image for GRIBBLE666

    by GRIBBLE666

    Friday, December 16 2011, 3:23PM

    “@2ladybugs

    You do suprise me with your naiveness
    they will wipe out the entire badger population they will not descriminate ,the people doing the killing enjoy killing for them it will be the more the merrier.”

  • Profile image for 2ladybugs

    by 2ladybugs

    Friday, December 16 2011, 3:19PM

    “@whothefizit


    "pointless and expensive". Maybe but then I can think of a few other things that are pointless and expensive, unemployable people, wars, etc. etc. but does complaining about them achieve anything? I think you may be going down the political road which does not sway me because as I have said on here before, until a government proves to me they are fit for purpose, I won't vote for them.”

  • Profile image for 2ladybugs

    by 2ladybugs

    Friday, December 16 2011, 3:09PM

    “@whothefizit

    These trials are to examine if it is safe, effective and humane. An Independent panel of experts will evaluate and report to the Ministers. Once all the facts have been collected then and only then will anything else go ahead if it proves viable/effective.

    Vaccination is still the preferred route. They are not going to eliminate all badgers. Nobody has said this would happen. Even the farmers have the sense to know that.

    A tiny part of our economy?”

  • Profile image for whothefizit

    by whothefizit

    Friday, December 16 2011, 2:48PM

    “@2ladybugs Then only total extermination of badgers ( if they are to blame ) will eliminate TB. This is clearly not going to happen so what is the point of trial culls? My point which you missed is that just because a native species happens to impinge on a tiny part of our economy doesnt mean we should embark on a pointless and expensive exercise simply to buy time and votes from the farming community”

  • Profile image for 2ladybugs

    by 2ladybugs

    Friday, December 16 2011, 2:33PM

    “@GRIBBLE


    Are Ireland free of TB in their cattle? You are as usual talking rubbish. A solution needs to be found and your sort of mindless ramblings won't help.

    Happy Christmas”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters