Is this the end of EU fish quotas?

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Profile image for This is Cornwall

This is Cornwall

DETESTED European rules blamed for bringing the South West's fishing industry to its knees may be consigned to the dustbin.

The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) governs every aspect of a fisherman's working life – including loathed laws forcing them to throw dead fish back into the sea if they exceed their catch quota.

Now, in an announcement tantamount to an admission of failure, the European Commission has called for a wholesale reform of the current policy, saying nothing else would ensure the survival of fish stocks and fishermen.

The news has been welcomed by the region's fishing communities.

Paul Trebilcock, chief executive of the Cornish Fish Producers Organisation, said most fishermen in the region would say it was about time.

"The CFP has been over-centralised, under reactive and ineffective, a result of which has been to bring the fishing industry to its knees.

"Fundamentally it has not done what it is supposed to and as result has been harmful to the industry.

"You won't get many arguments about that round here."

The CFP was established in 1983 to carve up EU fishing waters between the national fleets and is revised every decade.

Critics condemn it as horrifically bureaucratic, overly centralised in Brussels and so remote from the industry's front line that real concerns at a local levels are never heard.

The last set of rules, which clicked into place in 2002, paved the way for annual quota setting which fishermen feel have dealt their livelihoods year-on-year cutbacks.

A report by the Commission calling for changes of the policy has delivered a damning indictment of it, admitting fishing controls have not worked and the science supposed to underpin them is out of date.

The report says that 80 per cent of fish stocks in EU waters are still overfished, and about 30 per cent of stocks are "outside safe biological limits", meaning that there is a real risk of collapse of these stocks.

The Commission even admits that scientists are unaware of the state of nearly two-thirds of Europe's fish stocks.

Mr Trebilcock said the CFP was unpopular across the whole of Europe and radical changes were required if the fishing industry was to survive.

He welcomed early indications of the way CFP reform discussions were going, particularly concerning the devolution of power to member states.

"It's very encouraging at the moment – I am quite upbeat.

"There are some positive noises, but this is European politics and there is a long way to go."

Jim Portus, chief executive of the Brixham-based South West Fish Producers Organisation, said the CFP was long overdue for a "shake-up".

He said his organisation would be actively campaigning for the new CFP to be more locally responsive, respect inland territorial waters and put an end to fishermen being forced to dump their catch if it was over-quota.

"We look forward to responding to the consultation with the European Commission, such as applying some intelligence to fishermen having to throw away perfectly good catch."

The European Commission has invited "each and every citizen" to submit their views on plans for the reform of fisheries policy.

But this too has caused controversy, with some fishing leaders saying the new CFP should be decided by the industry.

Mr Portus said the idea that "Joe Public" should be given undue weight in the discussions over complex fishing policy for the people whose livelihood it was deciding "fills me with horror".

David Stevens, a fisherman in Newlyn, went a step further and said members of the public would not be invited to guide EU policy on farming or the chemical industry and so should not be given a say on fishing.

"It should stay within the industry," he said.

Overall, the UK Government has said it wants regional management of the CFP to be the cornerstone of a once-and-for-all reform to revive stocks and fishermen's livelihoods.

A spokesman said: "Ministers had a very constructive meeting, but it's only the start of a process that we hope will lead to meaningful reform and a more sustainable future for Europe's fisheries."

St Ives MP Andrew George, whose constituency includes Newlyn, said taking fisheries management away from Europe was long overdue.

"It has been bizarre to leave stock management to bureaucrats in landlocked Brussels," he added.

Meanwhile, the Marine Conservation Society, which has campaigned against overfishing and warned of the terrible damage which could be inflicted on the seas, told the Western Morning news it would be contributing to the debate.

A spokesman said: "UK fishermen have suffered as much or more than anyone else under the current CFP.

"It badly needs reform to be of benefit to the industry and to conserve fish stocks for the future.

"The Commission will need to listen to suggestions that enable sustainable fisheries to be better-managed throughout European and wider seas."

The consultation over CFP reform lasts until the end of the year, with new rules expected to take effect by 2013.

Do you have an opinion on how the future of the fishery industry should be shaped? E-mail the Western Morning News at wmnnewsdesk@westernmorningnews.co.uk or call 01752 765538.

19
Tweet this article
Report

19 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Jim Tait, Scotland

    Thursday, May 28 2009, 5:20PM

    “Yes the EU control mechanisms are inept and obscene. However we miss the main point. These controls are an attempt to redress the irresponsible over-fishing of fish stocks by the commercial fishing fleet. Through years of ignoring scientific advice from ICES and other agencies the stocks are virtually destroyed. We use fishing gear that destroys the fishes habitat. We use nets to catch fish that have not even had the chance to reproduce. The result is that stocks get lower and lower. Yet every year the commercial fishing community drone out that there are still lots of fish in the sea. They will not be happy until the last fish is dying flapping on a trawlers deck. Then they will turn round and say it is not our fault because we were only following the rules (sometimes). The rules that they pressurised our dubious politicians to make.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Charles Henry 1945-(diuturnity), Somersetshire

    Thursday, May 28 2009, 2:19PM

    “:| I am not an expert on this subject Barry (sorry for shouting). . Others are far more able to speak, but now for years and years, since our waters were 'given away' we have seen the decimation of the British fishing industry. . Best Charles.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by nic, penz

    Thursday, May 28 2009, 2:07PM

    “the fishermen get paid pennies ! the big families in charge get lots of cash, even have great hobbies like horse riding great holidays! and private education! they have raked the ocean for years! to pay for their property rebuilds, leave the fish alone, or pay the poor deck hands more brass???”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by barry luxton, rochester

    Thursday, May 28 2009, 12:11PM

    “Apologies, i won't call you Henry no more, Charles. No need to SHOUT though i can hear you. Just what are you on about, please enlighten me. While you are at it, perhaps you can comment about our inshore fishery that has been nutured and managed since we joined the eu, seeing that they don't have a part in it.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Charles Henry 1945-(diuturnity), Somersetshire

    Thursday, May 28 2009, 11:29AM

    “:| LUXTON; who do think nurtured and maintained our prime fishing grounds before the EU got their sticky fingers involved. . King Canute?”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article