Fox hunting ban 'harms animal welfare'

Trusted article source icon
Monday, June 29, 2009
Profile image for This is Cornwall

This is Cornwall

HUNTERS say a new report has "vindicated" their arguments against a ban after it concluded the activity is the most effective way of controlling foxes, and that all arguments of cruelty are "invalid".

The publication states hunting with hounds is "demonstrably the natural and most humane method of control", and there was "never any scientific evidence" to support a ban.

The all-party parliamentary Middle Way Group worked with the Veterinary Association for Wildlife Management to produce the document, which concluded the hunting ban of 2004 is "unscientific, unenforceable, socially divisive, and harms, rather than improves, animal welfare".

It continued: "Further it was passed in a way that shamed the Parliamentary process – simply a bad law, and therefore it must be repealed."

Yesterday, Alison Hawes, regional director of the Countryside Alliance, said the findings were another step towards the repeal the organisation is campaigning for. She said: "We are now looking at the probability of a repeal, rather than the possibility. The ball is really rolling in that direction."

David Cameron has already pledged the Conservatives will hold a free vote on the issue in Parliament time if they come to power, in an election likely to be held next year.

Ms Hawes said: "Providing Gordon Brown doesn't perform some miracle by June next year and we get a change of Government, potentially this hunting season could be the last under the ban."

East Devon MP Hugo Swire said the report backed claims the ban was never connected to animal welfare. He said: "It was always just another attack on rural and farming communities. It is a pernicious and vindictive act."

David Higman, chairman of the Dart Vale and South Pool Harriers in South Devon, said the report "vindicated" the argument hunters had put forward all along. He said: "To continue as we are now is not the way forward. It's not good for wildlife – it's not good for anybody. It's a shambles."

Jim Pascoe, chairman of the Four Burrows Hunt at Redruth, West Cornwall, said it was "perfectly obvious" hunting must be legalised again, albeit in a more regulated form. He said: "Hunts can't carry on operating under a ban indefinitely, but across the country everything has been kept up and running, ready for the time when we can hunt again properly."

But Louise Robertson, spokesman for the League Against Cruel Sports, stood by the campaign group's argument that fox hunting is inhumane.

She said: "If you look in the Burns Report, there's evidence from post-mortem results that this argument of foxes dying from a quick nip to the neck is rubbish. They can suffer severe wounding, internal bleeding and internal injuries. It is cruel. It's not a humane death."

And a spokesman for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, said there are "no plans" to revise the Hunting Act, which was passed to end a practice which a "clear majority" opposed because it causes "unnecessary suffering".

He said: "The Government considered all of the available evidence on the issue of hunting, and indeed generated much of it through the Burns Inquiry and the Portcullis House hearings. Much of this evidence supported a ban on hunting with dogs and on hare coursing events.

"Parliament listened to and debated the evidence extensively, and MPs from all main parties repeatedly voted for a ban by large majorities."

30
Tweet this article
Report

30 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Kev, South Yorkshire

    Tuesday, December 01 2009, 3:21PM

    “The complete amount of rubbish that is spoken about the type of people that hunt never ceases to amaze me. Toff's - I dont think so. Most of the people I know are road workers, truck drivers, garage mechanics etc many living in council houses not as most people would believe Castles and Mansions.Country Folk do not tell City dwellers how to run their cities so why do City people think they can enforce their views in the country. If people want to hunt then they should be allowed to without being made in to criminals. After all Hunting has been carried out by Royal Families for hundreds of years!”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by A Williamson, Hertfordshire (Rural)

    Thursday, July 09 2009, 12:31PM

    “I wonder why it is mainly the South West and Yorkshire that seems to attract people with no understanding of foxes and other wildlife? They all seem to accumulate in these places and then rant about something they think they are entitled to do to these creatures.
    FACT: Fox populations self-regulate.
    FACT: Interference from Verminmanspecies is unnecessary.
    FACT: Cruelty to animals is often (and increasingly) linked with cruelty to children and those unable to defend themselves.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Suricate, Northants

    Wednesday, July 08 2009, 7:47PM

    “It is very interesting to read the hypocritical comments regarding the so called cruelty of fox hunting from many that condone and enjoy fireworks.
    Fox hunting killed an estimated 13,000 foxes a year whereas fireworks continue to kill in excess of 25,000 animals a year.
    Seems what is enjoyment for some warrants death, suffering and terror. The animal welfare act 2006 states that it is an offence to submit any animal to unnecessary suffering, be it physical or mental yet where the perfectly justifiable and legitimate hunting and killing of vermin was banned by the bunny huggers fireworks because they are non class issue are allowed, even encouraged to carry on killing and terrifying pets.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Catalyst, Cornwall

    Friday, July 03 2009, 8:39AM

    “Amy Harchley, London ,

    Do you know anything of the history of this so-called sport?

    Please do some research before you spout off about moral bunkruptcy.

    Fox hunting is not about managing an animal, it is about hunting and killing for 'fun'.

    Check out this site for a history of hunting: http://www.greenacres-stud.com/foxhunting.htm

    Note the importing of foxes in the 19th century and the introduction of the larger fox from Sweden; why? To ensure that there are plenty of 'vermin' to hunt!

    Would you deliberately put rats into your house so that you could set traps for them??”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Lucy, Truro

    Thursday, July 02 2009, 5:07PM

    “Lindy Midlands - do you have a suggestion yourself on how you believe farmers could protect their livestock from foxes?

    In my opinion, burying a wire mesh fence 12 inches into the ground and making it 6 feet high may be all well and good for chicken but is it realistic in a 30 acre field?!

    Foxes contribute nothing, they're scavengers. The livestock they hunt and kill are worth money to farmers.

    Would all of you who disagree with hunting with dogs, agree that lamping for foxes with a shotgun would be a more humane way of managing the population? If I were a fox, I'd surely choose a quick death, rather than suffering with a blown apart leg for a few days because the gunners aim was a little off in the dark.

    I wonder if your opinions would differ, if it were your own animals being killed on a nightly basis?”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Amy Harchley, London

    Thursday, July 02 2009, 8:59AM

    “In response to Mirek W. from Melbourne, I think you should be v. careful lecturing on moral bankruptcy. I would argue that Australia's history of consistent persecution of its indigenous people is a pertinent example of moral bankruptcy. In addition, may be you should leave the suburbs of Melbourne and see how your farmers control wildlife (albeit introduced) with poison and poor marksmanship - both of which can cause unnecessary suffering. Hunting with dogs is the most humane way of controlling wildlife to maintain the right balance for biodiversity and human interests. While I admit the death of a hunted fox may look unpleasant, the time it takes to insensibility and death is irrefutably quicker than achieved by rifle or warfarin - there is no danger that the animal will spend hours bleeding to death or suffering from sepsis from a gunshot wound.
    People don't kill for pleasure although riding to hounds may be pleasurable; fox hunting is about managing an animal, with no natural predator, to ensure we achieve a balanced, healthy population. So before you wave your moral wand about I suggest you read up on the subject and may be your own history so you can make real judgements on the morality of activities or events.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Sarah, Truro

    Wednesday, July 01 2009, 2:48PM

    “Further to the comment made that farmers do not have any control over their livestock just totally proves my piont! If you have never been on a farm or known how a farmer controls their livestock YOU cannot possibly understand.

    In my years of hunting on horseback the excitement was wonderful not because we were chasing a animal to catch it and kill it but the fun of being out in the open and being free on my horse to gallop and jump gates/hedges. I may add that everytime I went hunting we never caught a fox- ever heard the saying 'Sly as a fox?'
    There are other ways a fox will be caught and killed and I can assure you that it is not pleasant.
    I am a animal lover but also coming across all your chickens dead after a fox has had them is heartbreaking!

    I understand that everone has a opinion but I would like to think that even if you do not agree with mine you can at least accept freedom of speech and opinion!”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by William, North West

    Wednesday, July 01 2009, 11:46AM

    “Denzil ... Supporting terriermen? Terrier work is still legal under the hunting act to protect game birds (lets face it were isnt there game birds). So you think terrier work is worse than the hunt? Surley that goes to show that this legislation has nothing to do with animal welfare it was just a misguided class war. Other wise terrier work would have been baned also? Hunting with dogs isnt cruel it is effective and it is selective in the animals it takes. Just because people enjoy it doesnt mean it is wrong. I bet the fox enjoys hunting its in our blood to hunt so why shouldnt we?”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Nick Singer, Kent

    Wednesday, July 01 2009, 10:29AM

    “The introduction of 'the ban' did nothing for animal welfare and less for civil liberties! It ignored the facts and was a cynical act of Labour spite driven by bigotry and fuelled by ignorance, all for reasons of cowardly political expediency.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by jonathan, Cape Town

    Wednesday, July 01 2009, 9:43AM

    “Hunting is part of a real dogs natural behaviour.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters