South West Water fined for causing pollution to stream
SOUTH WEST WATER has been fined £5,000 after sewage polluted a stream at Crackington Haven.
Last week the company pleaded guilty to causing noxious or polluting matter to enter controlled water in October 2008.
-

Environment agency
Bodmin magistrates heard that officers from the Environment Agency had been inspecting the Wainhouse Corner sewage treatment works, near Crackington Haven, when they discovered a number of faults.
Sewage effluent was escaping from a damaged pipe into a nearby field and then a stream.
The officers also saw evidence of sewage debris in the filter beds, a tipping bucket incorrectly positioned and the absence of splash plates from the ends of the filter bed spray bars.
Sewage fungus was visible in the stream for a distance of 150 metres – a sign that the area had been polluted.
Most of the faults had been rectified by December when the officers revisited the site. However, when they returned in January 2009, a whole new set of problems had occurred.
The most serious was a blockage in the treatment works main inlet that had become clogged with paper and faeces after heavy rain.
By-pass treatment
This resulted in all incoming sewage by-passing the full treatment process and discharging via a storm pipe into the stream.
Officers also found that a sack in the storm chamber, used to filter out large solids, was overflowing with sewage and sanitary waste.
John Cossens, prosecuting for the Environment Agency, said: "Water companies must ensure sewage treatment works under their control operate effectively and do not pose a risk to the environment.
"The pollution from this site was avoidable and was caused by inadequate inspections and maintenance by the water company."
South West Water was fined £5,000 and ordered to pay £2,284 in costs and a £15 victim surcharge. A spokesman for South West Water said: "As soon as the Environment Agency alerted us to the situation we immediately took steps to resolve the problems.
Minor impact
"We accept there would have been a temporary localised minor impact on water quality downstream from the works, but no impact was identified in the wider catchment.
"We have invested £10,000 at the site to reduce the risk of this ever happening again."








Comments