BREAKING NEWS
 

Thousands call for debate on 'privatisation'

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, October 02, 2012
Profile image for Western Morning News

Western Morning News

People power is set to throw a spanner in the works of a flagship policy to transfer core council services into a new private venture company.

In August, Cornwall Council's cabinet ignored opposition to press ahead with plans to sign an agreement with a private firm to establish a new company.

  1. County Hall

  2. Cornwall Council

A petition set up to force the matter back to the council chamber for a fresh debate has now passed the critical 5,000 threshold.

Independent councillor Andrew Wallis said the fact that this had taken just three weeks was "amazing".

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013

"This is an indication of the strength of feeling about this," he said.

"This is the public getting behind something to make their views known.

"I'm bowled over that in just three weeks we have more than 5,000 people on the petition.

"I'm still collating it all, but it's easily 5,500 and perhaps as high as 6,000."

If it was to go ahead, the new joint venture company would run a number of services for Cornwall Council and in theory be able to bid for work from other organisations.

Council chiefs, who must put the contract out to tender, say the £800 million contract could save the authority at least £2.5 million a year.

But apart from the principle of the deal, which has been condemned as privatisation by the back door, many have been angered by the way the decision was taken.

Despite the majority of councillors rejecting the plan, Cornwall Council's Cabinet said it would carry on regardless.

Mr Wallis said he had been inundated by comments from people disgusted with council leaders.

"Some people are telling me it is a travesty and not good for Cornwall.

"There is a strong feeling against what people see as part privatisation and there is a feeling that democracy has to work."

Unions have been set against the new venture, while even the deputy council leader and cabinet member Jim Currie described the move as a "massive risk."

In a leaked e-mail last week, he said it was a "distinct possibility that each job could cost the Cornish taxpayer one million pounds" with members limited to "push up council tax as their main involvement".

"The competitive dialogue process has been backed up by secrecy, loads of anecdotal comments including filibuster and threats of legal action but no real evidence," Councillor Currie said.

"Unfortunately, it takes ages to filter out the direction of travel so members are getting a kicking if they venture into the minefield."

Councillor Wallis said he was still counting the number of online and written signatures, which must amount to more than 5,000, and would submit the petition "very soon".

"The sooner this goes back to council the better as far as I'm concerned," he said. A spokesman for Cornwall Council issued a statement to say they would then act accordingly.

"The current number of signatures on the online petition calling on the authority to reverse its decision to proceed with a Strategic Partnership for Support Services, until such time the majority of the elected members of Cornwall Council have voted to support the proposals, stands at 3, 914.

"We have not yet received a copy of the written petitions.

"Once both elements of the petition have been formally presented to the Council the signatures will be verified in accordance with the Council's petition scheme.

"If the total number of signatures on the petition is more than 5,000, the matter will be debated by the full council.

"If the required number of signatures is reached, we will contact the promoter of the petition within ten days to inform them how the matter will be dealt with."

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for shagrats

    by shagrats

    Wednesday, October 03 2012, 11:53AM

    “S..Lavery !”

  • Profile image for shagrats

    by shagrats

    Wednesday, October 03 2012, 11:53AM

    “Why do the link to the petition never work when posted on this site ? Conspiracy theories please !.”

  • Profile image for kernewekonan

    by kernewekonan

    Wednesday, October 03 2012, 10:52AM

    “time to out source robertson & lavery full stop.”

  • Profile image for CallingtonFox

    by CallingtonFox

    Tuesday, October 02 2012, 7:42PM

    “by cweatherhill

    Tuesday, October 02 2012, 5:18PM

    "The answer's simple. Abolish this Cabinet system. It can never be right that 12 people can overturn the decisions of 123 councillors. It's an affront to democracy and this Cabinet did it twice in one week. What do we vote these 123 Councillors in for if this is going to happen?

    I agree with this entirely. I have never been convinced of the rightness of cabinet government at a council level as I have never been convinced that the committee system was a failure. It worked and allowed by far and away greater democratic control of council matters by all councillors.”

  • Profile image for cweatherhill

    by cweatherhill

    Tuesday, October 02 2012, 5:18PM

    “The answer's simple. Abolish this Cabinet system. It can never be right that 12 people can overturn the decisions of 123 councillors. It's an affront to democracy and this Cabinet did it twice in one week. What do we vote these 123 Councillors in for if this is going to happen?
    Enough! Clip the wings of these 12 would-be dictators NOW! Better still, throw them out of politics for good and all. After close scrutiny of their bank balances.”

  • Profile image for josdave

    by josdave

    Tuesday, October 02 2012, 3:59PM

    “The dictatorship of Lavery Robertson and the Cabinet will ensure this goes through whatever the public, who pay their wages, thinks about it. So look out for job losses, inferior services and increased bills to us the council taxpayers.”

  • Profile image for cheekyman_jr

    by cheekyman_jr

    Tuesday, October 02 2012, 2:57PM

    “Saving 2.5 million a year?

    Whatever happened to the millions they were going to save when the Council became unitary?

    Oh, yeah...I remember, that only happened when they fired "lower down" staff and kept the highly paid ones (except for those who could leave with a big pension)...and get the remaining staff to reapply for their jobs at a lower rate of pay.

    Can we please get rid of Robertson and Lavery now?”

  • Profile image for DoUntoOthers

    by DoUntoOthers

    Tuesday, October 02 2012, 1:44PM

    “As serious as this issue is, one thing that has been seriously unreported is that this also heavily involves the NHS in Cornwall. If this council plan goes through it is highly likely in my view that the NHS IT in Cornwall will also be privatised. Scary thought.”

  • Profile image for robertwebber1

    by robertwebber1

    Tuesday, October 02 2012, 1:43PM

    “Don't stop signing if you have not yet. 5,000 signatures is not th end but the beginning its vital campaigners keep the pressure up until this policy is stopped.

    3986 on the online version sounds like at least 6,000 total but I'am sure many more petitions have not been handed in to Cornwall Council or Cllr Wallis so get them in and keep collected in your neighbourhoods.

    http://tinyurl.com/9tfbvw6 P42ID210201213392”

  • Profile image for nickthompson

    by nickthompson

    Tuesday, October 02 2012, 11:32AM

    “Instead of going through all the time and trouble of privatising the services that we pay for,why not send a few million pounds of our council tax monies direct to the share holder's of this private venture company, because this will happen if we allow them to privatise something that belongs TO US.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article