Figures show unions fight public sector job cuts with £2m from taxpayers
Trade unions in the South West have been given almost £2 million of taxpayers' money to help them fight public sector job cuts, it has been revealed.
Figures obtained through the Freedom of Information Act show that unions nationally received more than £85 million from the public purse last year – an annual increase of 14 per cent.
-

George Eustice
Across the region the salaries of more than 43 full-time shop stewards are effectively paid for out of public funds.
The payments were criticised by the Conservative MP for Camborne, Redruth and Hayle, George Eustice.
He said: "I accept that unions have a role to play in our democratic life but I think it's completely wrong that they should be subsidised or funded by the taxpayer."
The payments, made up of direct grants and paid time off work, were revealed this week by the TaxPayers' Alliance.
The South West Regional Development Agency topped the list in the Westcountry, receiving £521,864.
Facility time for union duties was paid for the equivalent of nine staff at Devon County Council at a cost of £239,681.
Across the Tamar, five full-time staff at Cornwall Council, affiliated to seven unions, were funded to the tune of £141,378.
Matthew Sinclair, director of the TaxPayers' Alliance (TPA), said "big, rich public sector unions" who take an active political role should not be funded by the taxpayer.
"Trade unions are lining up to fight vital cuts in public spending and threatening strikes that could cause massive disruption for ordinary families," he added.
"By financing their other work, like representing and recruiting members, taxpayers' money frees up union funds for political contributions and expensive campaigns." The research was compiled by sending requests to more than 1,200 of public sector organisations. The 133-page document reveals the estimated value of the paid time off that union members receive in each organisation.
The £85 million is made up of £18.3 million in direct payments from public sector organisations and an estimated £67.5 million in paid staff time. This equates to 2,493 full-time public sector employees working at the taxpayers' expense.
A total of 21 organisations across the South West were shown to have received £1.8 million during 2009/10. The UK's largest public sector union, Unison, accused the TPA of "wasting millions of pounds of public money by demanding answers from public bodies to spurious questions".
General secretary Dave Prentis said the group was "digging up another tired old chestnut" to further its own political interests, at huge cost to the public.
"Attacking trade unions who work with employers to create an efficient, more motivated workplace is just plain daft," he said. "Public services are facing savage cutbacks and workers have a right to have their voices heard and rightly expect their union reps to be there to help them when they need them most.
"If trade union stewards are going to represent staff properly, they need time away from their usual jobs to do it."
Mr Prentis pointed to research commissioned by the Department for Business in 2007, which suggested that "effective and engaged union representation" saves between £170 million and £400 million a year. This, he argued, contrasts with the estimated £1m the union calculates it cost the country to answer the request.
Mr Prentis added: "Collective bargaining saves cash. If councils or the NHS had to negotiate individually with all their staff, they would be forced to spend a fortune on consultants or mediators.
Mr Eustice said he had always opposed the "so-called modernisation fund" which he claims under the last government handed out £10 million in grants.
NHS trusts in the Westcountry accounted for £327,172 equivalent to around 11 staff.
The most expensive was Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust at £159,524 and six full-time posts.
Mid Devon District Council cost the taxpayer £265,691, around 10 staff, in four months from January to April this year. The South Western Ambulance Trust cost £43,063 and Avon Fire and Rescue £27,084.








20 Comments
View all
by David, St Austell
Thursday, September 09 2010, 7:05PM
“The last government with any vestige of Socialism was that of Atlee. While he (Churchill) made a good leader during the was I for one am glad he lost in 1945. The Tories under him opposed the plan for the NHS and, as another Labour government did not surface till the 60s we would be in a very sorry state today were it not for Atlee. As for the unions the political parties also receive public funding for many of their campaigns so is it one rule for them and another for the rest of us?”
by TimV, Pz
Wednesday, September 08 2010, 2:09PM
“@ Tommy Sampson, Bude - an intentional misinterpretation of my point I'm thinking, but amusing. To take up your own, whoever you have at the top of the governmental pyramid you have to protect. I doubt that Mr Sarcozy or Mr Obama are any cheaper do you? The issue as to whether in the case of the United Kingdom, it should be an hereditary monarchy or an elected politician is a separate debate. I for one am firmly of the opinion that our present arrangement, developed over at least a thousand years, may have its faults but that no better system immediately presents itself. We maintain a hugely respected, influential Head of State, insulated from the rough and tumble of party politics, yet devoid of actual power to decide policy. To paraphrase the Queen's own word "the system we have, for all its faults, seems to work". We interfere with the precarious balance between interests at our peril. It provides a ritual and sentimental continuity, stability, and unity that are hard to quantify but equally hard to put a value to and certainly worth the few bob we each contribute towards it. I can't think of a better person to do the onerous national and international job, can you?”
by Claudette Chelmley Baker, Falmouth
Tuesday, September 07 2010, 5:26PM
“Big Ger, you mention British Airways in your posting at 12.18, the current dispute is not about money, but about little Willie Walsh dictating terms without negotiations, I am sure the fact that little Willie takes home £743,000 a year has nothing to do with it.”
by Charles Henry 1945-(diuturnity), Somersetshire
Tuesday, September 07 2010, 5:20PM
“:) You wicked girl Patricia. . I think you are just being argumentative. . I know we have been steadily burying Socialism since the war, but it has reared it's ugly head a few times since, only to be mortally wounded by Margaret Thatcher thank goodness, particularly after Harold Wilson's and Dennis Healey's shenanigans. . The thing about modern 'Socialists' like Bob Crow; they all enjoy the champagne lifestyle that capitalism affords them. . Give me Tony Benn any time. . I've always believed that in times of real strife like war, we need a coalition of the Left and Right. . They both care about our country. . It's the 'soggy centre' that has steadily lead us in this new 'European Soviet'. . Just control freaks; all of them.”
by Tommy Sampson, Bude
Tuesday, September 07 2010, 5:17PM
“Tim V, " Why has it taken so long to apply such good common sense across the board" I agree, the Royal's should pay for their own protection.”
by Ben Stacey, Cornwall
Tuesday, September 07 2010, 5:13PM
“Given the choice, I would rather give ordinary worker's 2 million pounds (through their union) to help save their jobs, than giving the Royals 113 million for 12 months Police protection.”
by Patrica Southern, Penzance
Tuesday, September 07 2010, 4:44PM
“Charles I did not expect a reply,simply because there is not one, I, at 76 years of age cannot remember Britain under a Socialist Government, what I can,and do remember are so called Labour Governments carrying through Conservative policies.”
by TimV, Pz
Tuesday, September 07 2010, 2:05PM
“I have no problem with there being staff representation, or that their position is protected by the law, but I do have a problem with it being subsidised out of tax. If workers are dedicated to a cause, why should they not do it in their own time and without payment? If payment is required the union members should meet the cost. John Lewis has proved the success of non-confrontational staff involvement based on shared interest. Why has it taken so long to apply such good common sense across the board?”
by Charles Henry 1945-(diuturnity), Somersetshire
Tuesday, September 07 2010, 1:14PM
“:) Patricia my dear, you are such a pedant.
Here's a quote from your precious 'Guardian' for you.
"The basic Labour idea since the 1950s was that socialism was unnecessary, because a capitalist system could be relied on to flourish and to generate more wealth than any other. All socialists had to do was to ensure its equitable distribution. But since the 1970s the accelerating surge of globalisation made it more and more difficult and fatally undermined the traditional basis of the Labour party's, and indeed any social-democratic party's, support and policies. Many in the 1980s agreed that if the ship of Labour was not to founder, which was a real possibility at the time, it would have to be refitted."
Of course it took Blair and Mandelson to hammer the final nails. . It's just a shame they didn't take account of their chancellors incompetence. . Best Charles”
by Big Ger, Truro
Tuesday, September 07 2010, 12:18PM
“Elliot, the only sector I believe where employers have been; "holding champagne party's to celebrate receiving multi million pounds by way of bonuses on top of 6 figure salarys," is the banking sector.
Have the bosses of the London underground where the unions have now called strike action been doing so? Were the bosses of British Airways doing so when the unions there called for strikes?
Care to give us some examples of where strike action has been called in response to such bonuses?”